RCFR Insights | Coach Q

A Tale of Two Texases

Two strong Texas teams. Two dramatically different resumes. Two very different playoff outcomes.

Texas delivered the biggest win of Week 3, beating Ohio State and earning the No. 1 spot in the Consensus ranking.

RCFR rewarded it too.

That's exactly what a resume-based ranking should do: reward teams for playing quality opponents and beating them.

But the win also reminded us of something interesting.

We've seen two very different Texas resumes over the last two seasons.

And their postseason outcomes tell an important story about how college football evaluates teams.

The Tale of Two Texas Teams

2024 TEXAS
CFP Rank #3
RCFR Rank #12
CFP vs. RCFR Delta -9
Top 25 Wins 0
Top 25 Games 2
Playoff YES
2025 TEXAS
CFP Rank #13
RCFR Rank #3
CFP vs. RCFR Delta +10
Top 25 Wins 3
Top 25 Games 5
Playoff NO

2024: The Resume Didn't Match the Ranking

Texas was a strong football team in 2024.

But RCFR isn't designed to answer who looks like one of the best teams. It asks a different question:

What did you actually accomplish against quality competition?

At the end of the 2024 regular season, Texas was ranked #3 by the CFP but only #12 by RCFR.

The reason was straightforward:

0

Top 25 wins.

Texas had accumulated wins, but its resume lacked the quality wins RCFR values most.

The CFP still placed Texas near the very top of its rankings, and Texas made the College Football Playoff.

2025: A Completely Different Resume

One year later, the story flipped.

The 2025 Texas team built exactly the type of resume RCFR is designed to reward.

3 Top 25 Wins   |   5 Top 25 Games

RCFR ranked Texas #3.

The CFP ranked Texas #13.

That created one of the largest differences between the two ranking systems — this time in the opposite direction from 2024.

And despite the much stronger quality resume, Texas did not make the playoff.

Same Program. Very Different Resumes.

Season CFP Rank RCFR Rank Delta Top 25 Wins Top 25 Games Playoff
2024 Texas #3 #12 -9 0 2 YES
2025 Texas #13 #3 +10 3 5 NO

Both Texas teams were strong.

But their resumes were not remotely the same.

2024

0 Top 25 wins

CFP #3

RCFR #12

Made the playoff.

2025

3 Top 25 wins

CFP #13

RCFR #3

Missed the playoff.

Why This Matters

The contrast illustrates the fundamental difference between RCFR and traditional rankings.

RCFR doesn't begin with reputation, perception or projected team strength.

It begins with the resume.

Who did you play? Who did you beat? What did you accomplish?

In 2024, Texas had the better CFP ranking.

In 2025, Texas had the better quality resume.

Yet the team with zero Top 25 wins made the playoff, while the team with three Top 25 wins did not.

That's exactly the type of difference RCFR was created to expose.

And Now Comes 2026

Which brings us back to this year's Texas team.

Texas just beat Ohio State in the biggest game of Week 3.

That's a quality opponent.

That's a quality win.

And that's why Texas deserves to be rewarded for it in a resume-based ranking.

Play better teams. Beat better teams. Build a better resume.

The lesson from the last two Texas seasons is simple:

Quality wins matter. And the opportunity to earn those wins begins with playing a quality schedule.

COACH Q'S TAKE

Texas gives us a nearly perfect two-year case study.

In 2024, Texas had zero Top 25 wins and made the playoff. In 2025, Texas had three Top 25 wins and missed it.

Both were good football teams. But only one built the stronger quality resume.

College football should reward teams for playing better opponents and beating them.

— Coach Q
QUALITY WINS MATTER.
Quality schedules create quality opportunities. Quality wins build better resumes.