| 1 |
Oregon |
2 |
-1 |
Slightly High |
The résumé has fewer quality wins than several teams ranked behind. |
| 2 |
Ohio State |
6 |
-4 |
Too High |
The résumé has fewer quality wins than several teams ranked behind. |
| 3 |
Georgia |
3 |
0 |
Correct |
The résumé supports this placement. |
| 4 |
Miami |
22 |
-18 |
Much Too High |
The record is strong, but the résumé lacks a ranked victory. |
| 5 |
Texas |
15 |
-10 |
Much Too High |
The résumé has fewer quality wins than several teams ranked behind. |
| 6 |
Penn State |
16 |
-10 |
Much Too High |
The record is strong, but the résumé lacks a ranked victory. |
| 7 |
Tennessee |
8 |
-1 |
Slightly High |
The résumé has fewer quality wins than several teams ranked behind. |
| 8 |
Indiana |
23 |
-15 |
Much Too High |
The record is strong, but the résumé lacks a ranked victory. |
| 9 |
BYU |
5 |
+4 |
Too Low |
Multiple quality wins create a stronger résumé than teams ranked ahead. |
| 10 |
Notre Dame |
10 |
0 |
Correct |
The résumé supports this placement. |
| 11 |
Alabama |
1 |
+10 |
Much Too Low |
Multiple quality wins create a stronger résumé than teams ranked ahead. |
| 12 |
Boise State |
11 |
+1 |
Slightly Low |
The résumé compares favorably with several teams ranked ahead. |
| 13 |
SMU |
13 |
0 |
Correct |
The résumé supports this placement. |
| 14 |
Texas A&M |
4 |
+10 |
Much Too Low |
Multiple quality wins create a stronger résumé than teams ranked ahead. |
| 15 |
LSU |
9 |
+6 |
Too Low |
The résumé compares favorably with several teams ranked ahead. |
| 16 |
Ole Miss |
19 |
-3 |
Too High |
The record is strong, but the résumé lacks a ranked victory. |
| 17 |
Iowa State |
25 |
-8 |
Much Too High |
The record is strong, but the résumé lacks a ranked victory. |
| 18 |
Pittsburgh |
18 |
0 |
Correct |
The résumé supports this placement. |
| 19 |
Kansas State |
12 |
+7 |
Much Too Low |
The résumé compares favorably with several teams ranked ahead. |
| 20 |
Colorado |
21 |
-1 |
Slightly High |
The record is strong, but the résumé lacks a ranked victory. |
| 21 |
Washington State |
17 |
+4 |
Too Low |
The résumé compares favorably with several teams ranked ahead. |
| 22 |
Louisville |
NR |
— |
Too High |
The résumé has fewer quality wins than several teams ranked behind. |
| 23 |
Clemson |
20 |
+3 |
Too Low |
The résumé compares favorably with several teams ranked ahead. |
| 24 |
Missouri |
14 |
+10 |
Much Too Low |
The résumé compares favorably with several teams ranked ahead. |
| 25 |
Army |
24 |
+1 |
Slightly Low |
The résumé compares favorably with several teams ranked ahead. |
