| 1 |
Oregon |
1 |
0 |
Correct |
The résumé supports this placement. |
| 2 |
Ohio State |
4 |
-2 |
Slightly High |
The résumé has fewer quality wins than several teams ranked behind. |
| 3 |
Texas |
16 |
-13 |
Much Too High |
The record is strong, but the résumé lacks a ranked victory. |
| 4 |
Penn State |
12 |
-8 |
Much Too High |
The résumé has fewer quality wins than several teams ranked behind. |
| 5 |
Notre Dame |
7 |
-2 |
Slightly High |
The résumé has fewer quality wins than several teams ranked behind. |
| 6 |
Miami |
22 |
-16 |
Much Too High |
The record is strong, but the résumé lacks a ranked victory. |
| 7 |
Georgia |
3 |
+4 |
Too Low |
Multiple quality wins create a stronger résumé than teams ranked ahead. |
| 8 |
Tennessee |
9 |
-1 |
Slightly High |
The résumé has fewer quality wins than several teams ranked behind. |
| 9 |
SMU |
17 |
-8 |
Much Too High |
The record is strong, but the résumé lacks a ranked victory. |
| 10 |
Indiana |
18 |
-8 |
Much Too High |
The record is strong, but the résumé lacks a ranked victory. |
| 11 |
Boise State |
11 |
0 |
Correct |
The résumé supports this placement. |
| 12 |
Clemson |
20 |
-8 |
Much Too High |
The record is strong, but the résumé lacks a ranked victory. |
| 13 |
Alabama |
2 |
+11 |
Much Too Low |
Multiple quality wins create a stronger résumé than teams ranked ahead. |
| 14 |
Ole Miss |
5 |
+9 |
Much Too Low |
Multiple quality wins create a stronger résumé than teams ranked ahead. |
| 15 |
South Carolina |
6 |
+9 |
Much Too Low |
Multiple quality wins create a stronger résumé than teams ranked ahead. |
| 16 |
Arizona State |
10 |
+6 |
Too Low |
The résumé compares favorably with several teams ranked ahead. |
| 17 |
Tulane |
24 |
-7 |
Much Too High |
The record is strong, but the résumé lacks a ranked victory. |
| 18 |
Iowa State |
23 |
-5 |
Too High |
The record is strong, but the résumé lacks a ranked victory. |
| 19 |
BYU |
8 |
+11 |
Much Too Low |
The résumé compares favorably with several teams ranked ahead. |
| 20 |
Texas A&M |
13 |
+7 |
Much Too Low |
The résumé compares favorably with several teams ranked ahead. |
| 21 |
Missouri |
14 |
+7 |
Much Too Low |
The résumé compares favorably with several teams ranked ahead. |
| 22 |
UNLV |
21 |
+1 |
Slightly Low |
The résumé compares favorably with several teams ranked ahead. |
| 23 |
Illinois |
15 |
+8 |
Much Too Low |
The résumé compares favorably with several teams ranked ahead. |
| 24 |
Kansas State |
NR |
— |
Too High |
The résumé has fewer quality wins than several teams ranked behind. |
| 25 |
Colorado |
25 |
0 |
Correct |
The résumé supports this placement. |
